Moral Action Committee
  • Home
  • Purpose
  • Executive Director
  • Trustees
  • Issues
  • Your Voice
  • Action Alerts
  • Links
  • Archives
  • Gallery
  • Moral Action Network

Baptist Missionary Association Seminary White Paper

1/28/2017

0 Comments

 
 
            During the August 2014 meeting of the Baptist Missionary Association of America’s (BMA) Coordination Council, Dr. John Adams presented a report on behalf of the Moral Action Agency.  The report included a sobering description of current trends that contradict biblical teaching on marriage.  The council discussed the issue and requested that the faculty of the BMA Seminary compose wording for a proposed amendment to the BMA Doctrinal Statement that articulated both scriptural teaching and the persistent belief of BMA churches regarding the institution of marriage.  Following consultation with Moral Action’s executive director, the seminary faculty adjusted a prior statement, Article IIIC, and prepared a new statement, Article IIID, for the council’s consideration.  Chairman Ed Stephenson presented the statements to Springhill Baptist Church, Greenbrier, Arkansas, for approval.  Subsequently, Springhill Baptist Church chose to recommend that the BMA adopt the statements during its annual 2015 meeting as an amendment to the association’s Doctrinal Statement.
 
             “Have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning made them male and female.  And said, for this cause shall a man leave father and mother and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh?”  (Matthew 19:4-5).  In this passage, Jesus referred to Genesis 2:23 and quoted from Genesis 2:24.  Because God created both humans and marriage, humans must recognize themselves as accountable to His intent for marriage. 
            Genesis 2:24-25 identifies the special and exclusive relationship of the adult human male and female, joined together as husband and wife (Gen. 2:24, 25), as the most fundamental and basic human relationship.  This relationship is said to have been designed directly by God and serves as the sole basis for a distinct family unit in perpetuity (Gen. 2:24, 25; Gen. 4:1, 17) and is even intended to be interminable except under specific, extreme circumstances (Matt. 19:8).  These passages declare that God’s reason for creating male and female finds its ultimate purpose in the ability of male and female to become one flesh.  The concept of one flesh includes physical (i.e., sexual), spiritual, mental, and emotional components.  While some may argue for the possibility of such oneness outside the bounds of the monogamous heterosexual union, such arguments simply lack legitimate support from the Bible.
            A marriage is to be comprised of a biological (i.e., “natural”) man and woman.  Because of the brokenness of creation as a whole, and the human race in particular, humans made in God’s image sometimes face difficult disorders of sexuality which call for great compassion and sensitivity among God’s people.  First, there are some who perceive themselves to be the opposite gender in spite of their physical sexual characteristics (i.e., a biological male identifies psychologically as a woman, or vice versa).  As noted in article IIIC., God has designed the human race to be male and female, and he has prohibited same-sex sexual behavior.  Accordingly, Scripture does not make possible the separation of sex and gender as the transgender movement has done.  One who is biologically male must strive, by God’s redeeming and sanctifying grace, to live as a man, and likewise one who is biologically female must strive to live as a woman – hence the language “a natural man and a natural woman” in the doctrinal statement proposal.
            It is important to note that cases of sexual or marital union outside the bounds of a monogamous and heterosexual marriage, even if found in the Bible, simply deviate from God’s intention for marriage and should not be considered as examples for living or doctrinal truths.  A great deal of thought, study, and debate has gone into the particular wording of these revisions in hopes of presenting well-articulated statements that both reflect biblical teaching and address important issues related to personhood, marriage, and sexuality.
            The need for such clarification of biblical teaching, as described in the proposed amendments, comes amidst increasing political and social pressures to accept and promote ideas and actions that violate biblical truths.  BMA Seminary faculty has made the entire paper available at http://bmats.edu/marriage.

0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    John Adams' Review

     

    Archives

    January 2017
    January 2016
    February 2015
    January 2015
    September 2014
    August 2014
    June 2014
    January 2014
    October 2013
    July 2013
    May 2013
    March 2013
    January 2013
    October 2012
    September 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    January 2012
    October 2011
    August 2011
    June 2011
    January 2011
    September 2010
    July 2010
    March 2010
    January 2010
    November 2009
    August 2009
    June 2009
    May 2009
    February 2009
    January 2009
    December 2008
    November 2008
    September 2008

    Categories

    All
    America
    Christians
    Israel
    Justice
    Leadership

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.